The idea of an agreement under coercion is that the agreement was not freely entered into, but rather, it was coerced. Coercion can take many forms, including physical threats, psychological manipulation, emotional blackmail, or financial pressure. An agreement under coercion is not a valid contract because there is no free and mutual consent between the parties.

In legal terms, a contract is only binding if it meets certain criteria, including mutual assent, consideration, and legality. Mutual assent means that both parties freely and willingly agree to the terms of the contract. Consideration means that both parties receive something of value in exchange for their promise. Legality means that the contract is not illegal or against public policy.

An agreement under coercion violates the principle of mutual assent because one party is not freely consenting to the terms of the contract. If a person is threatened with physical harm or emotional blackmail to sign a contract, there is no real agreement because it was not made freely. Similarly, if a party is forced to sign a contract due to financial desperation, there is no mutual assent because one party did not have a choice.

An agreement under coercion also violates the principle of legality because it may be against public policy or the law to engage in certain actions. For example, if a person is forced to sign a contract to perform illegal activities, the contract is not legal or enforceable.

In SEO terms, using the phrase “agreement under coercion” in your content can be beneficial for several reasons. Firstly, it demonstrates a level of expertise and knowledge in a specific area of law. Secondly, it can help improve search engine rankings, as the phrase is specific and may not be used as frequently in other articles. Finally, it can help clarify the importance of free and mutual assent in contract law, making it easier for readers to understand the legal implications of agreements made under coercion.

In conclusion, an agreement under coercion is not a valid contract because it violates the principle of mutual assent and legality. As a professional, it is important to understand the legal implications of certain phrases and terms, in order to create informative and relevant content for readers. The phrase “agreement under coercion” can be used to demonstrate expertise and improve search engine rankings while educating readers on the importance of free and mutual consent in contract law.